Close Menu

    Subscribe to Updates

    Get the latest creative news from FooBar about art, design and business.

    What's Hot

    Antarctic and Arctic ice trends rebelled against climate models and terrible predictions

    May 17, 2025

    Climatologists refute the “hottest year ever” claim: “not even closed”

    May 17, 2025

    From Pakistan – Nuclear winter in India could kill 2 billion » Yale's climate link

    May 16, 2025
    Facebook X (Twitter) Instagram
    Weather Guru Academy
    Facebook X (Twitter) Instagram Pinterest
    • Home
    • Weather
    • Climate
    • Weather News
    • Forecasts
    • Storms
    Subscribe
    Weather Guru Academy
    Home»Weather»The Supreme Court passed up the chance to block two radical Biden-Harris climate regulations — was it worth it?
    Weather

    The Supreme Court passed up the chance to block two radical Biden-Harris climate regulations — was it worth it?

    cne4hBy cne4hOctober 7, 2024No Comments3 Mins Read
    Facebook Twitter Pinterest LinkedIn Tumblr Email
    Share
    Facebook Twitter LinkedIn Pinterest Email Copy Link

    From the Daily Caller

    daily caller news foundation

    Nick Pope
    Contributor

    The Supreme Court on Friday declined to block two key Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) regulations, dealing a blow to red state and industry interests challenging the rules.

    The court did not step in to halt the Environmental Protection Agency's rules tightening limits on mercury in emissions from coal-fired power plants and methane from oil and gas production, meaning the rules will apparently remain in effect while challengers' lawsuits make their way through lower courts, according to Reuters News agency reports. The groups and states filing emergency appeals to the Supreme Court argued that the agency exceeded its legal authority when it issued regulations under the Clean Air Act, and that the EPA stripped states of their ability to set their own emissions rules.

    Reuters reports that the mercury regulations will reduce the amount of toxic metals allowed to be emitted by all coal-fired power plants by 67% and tighten mercury emission limits from lignite power plants by 70%. Challengers, including oil and gas developers, mining companies and groups focused on electricity markets, argue the EPA went too far in issuing new restrictions that would effectively force coal-fired power plants to retire early, jeopardizing America’s energy reliability. (Related: Officials told Biden's EPA its aggressive green power plant plan had serious flaws, documents show)

    'Unavoidable and foreseeable': Grid operators ask court to strike down EPA rules to save power system from collapse https://t.co/0LAt8gHVSN

    — Daily Caller (@DailyCaller) September 18, 2024

    According to Reuters, the methane rules also address emissions of a category called “volatile organic compounds” and are intended to limit flaring, the burning of excess methane during oil and gas production. The rules also require developers to more closely monitor potential methane leaks from their oil and gas infrastructure and establish methane leak reporting programs specifically for methane “super polluters.”

    “EPA is pleased that the Supreme Court has denied a petition to stay enforcement of the Amended Mercury and Air Toxic Standards (MATS),” an EPA spokesperson said in a statement shared with the Daily Caller News Foundation. “The revised MATS rule will ensure that the nation's coal-fired power plants meet the latest standards for hazardous air pollutants, reflect the latest advances in pollution control technology, and is firmly rooted in the authority of its Clean Air Act.”

    The U.S. Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit declined in July and August to temporarily block both rules while it reviewed them, Reuters reported.

    In recent years, the Supreme Court has moved to block major regulatory initiatives by the EPA, such as its landmark 2022 ruling in West Virginia v. EPA that vacated the agency’s 2014 Clean Power Plan, To reshape the U.S. power grid so that it relies heavily on green energy to replace fossil fuels.

    In June, the court also overturned the “Chevron deference” precedent that had allowed agencies such as the EPA broad discretion to interpret ambiguous regulations. This particular ruling already challenges some of the most aggressive regulatory actions taken by the Biden-Harris EPA to date.

    Editor's note: This article has been updated to include comments from the EPA.

    All content created by the Daily Caller News Foundation, an independent, nonpartisan newswire service, is free and available to any legitimate news publisher that can deliver a large audience. All republished articles must include our logo, the reporter's byline, and their DCNF affiliation. If you have any questions about our guidelines or working with us, please contact licensing@dailycallernewsfoundation.org.

    Like this:

    like loading…

    Relevant



    Source link

    Share. Facebook Twitter Pinterest LinkedIn Tumblr Email
    Previous ArticleCPAC Australia 2024 – A new climate change book, and a disturbing statement about free speech – Not happy about it?
    Next Article Tampa Bay’s best- and worst-case hurricane scenarios » Yale Climate Connection
    cne4h
    • Website

    Related Posts

    Weather

    Green policy, not Trump's tariffs, killed British steel – Wattwatt?

    By cne4hApril 9, 2025
    Weather

    The Green Agenda is Collapse – Watt?

    By cne4hApril 9, 2025
    Weather

    Trump signs executive order to protect U.S. energy from excessive damages from the state – Watt gets along with it?

    By cne4hApril 9, 2025
    Weather

    Internal sector restores coal industry – Watt

    By cne4hApril 9, 2025
    Weather

    Evidence of catastrophic glacier melting in New York City? – Watt?

    By cne4hApril 8, 2025
    Weather

    We have to consider extreme climate solutions – Watt?

    By cne4hApril 8, 2025
    Add A Comment
    Leave A Reply Cancel Reply

    Don't Miss

    Antarctic and Arctic ice trends rebelled against climate models and terrible predictions

    By cne4hMay 17, 2025

    Ice in Antarctica is increasing Check out the Helmholtz Association’s climate website, under the ambitious…

    Climatologists refute the “hottest year ever” claim: “not even closed”

    May 17, 2025

    From Pakistan – Nuclear winter in India could kill 2 billion » Yale's climate link

    May 16, 2025

    Pennsylvania Supreme Court lodged RGGI carbon tax to officials

    May 16, 2025
    Demo
    Top Posts

    Antarctic and Arctic ice trends rebelled against climate models and terrible predictions

    May 17, 2025

    Syracuse Watch | News, Weather, Sports, Breaking News

    July 14, 2024

    The weather service says Beryl's remnants spawned four Indiana tornadoes, including an EF-3 | News

    July 14, 2024

    PM Modi seeks blessings of Jyotirmat and Dwarka Peesh Shankaracharyas on Anant Ambani-Radhika businessman wedding

    July 14, 2024
    Stay In Touch
    • Facebook
    • Twitter
    • Pinterest
    • Instagram
    • YouTube
    • Vimeo

    Subscribe to Updates

    Get the latest creative news from SmartMag about art & design.

    Ads
    adster1
    Legal Pages
    • About Us
    • Contact Us
    • Disclaimer
    • Privacy Policy
    Our Picks

    Antarctic and Arctic ice trends rebelled against climate models and terrible predictions

    May 17, 2025

    Climatologists refute the “hottest year ever” claim: “not even closed”

    May 17, 2025

    From Pakistan – Nuclear winter in India could kill 2 billion » Yale's climate link

    May 16, 2025
    Most Popular

    Antarctic and Arctic ice trends rebelled against climate models and terrible predictions

    May 17, 2025

    Syracuse Watch | News, Weather, Sports, Breaking News

    July 14, 2024

    The weather service says Beryl's remnants spawned four Indiana tornadoes, including an EF-3 | News

    July 14, 2024
    Ads
    ads2

    Type above and press Enter to search. Press Esc to cancel.