A UK government agency has been found to have falsified weather data from more than 100 non-existent weather stations to promote a climate change narrative and net-zero agenda driven by globalist interests. [emphasis, links added]
Shockingly, These fabricated data found their way into climate models used by leading institutions around the worldinfluencing the United Nations and other global organizations in shaping climate policy and promoting alarmist narratives.
After numerous Freedom of Information (FOI) requests to the Met Office and diligent field visits to various weather stations, investigator Ray Sanders discovered that, 103 of the 302 sites that provided temperature averages were absent.
“How could any reasonable observer know that these data were not true and were simply 'made up' by government agencies,” Sanders asked.
He called for a “public statement” about the fraudulent nature of existing published climate data “to avoid other agencies and researchers using unreliable data and drawing erroneous conclusions.”
In his native Kent, Saunders found Four of the eight locations identified by the Met Officenamely Dungeness, Folkestone, Dover and Gillingham, all of which have rolling temperature averages accurate to the second decimal place – It's a “novel”.
The Daily Skeptic reports Dungeness has had no weather station since 1986. None of these four stations appear in the list of weather stations classified by the World Meteorological Organization (WMO).
The Met Office directs online inquiries about Dover to the “nearest climate station” at Dover Port (Beach), with a full set of 30-year rolling averages.
According to Met Office coordinates, the location is on Dover Beach, as shown in the Google Earth photo below.
It seems unlikely that any scientific organization would set up a temperature monitoring station that might be regularly flooded.
Who runs this radio station on the beach? Are accurate records kept for 30 years? Why is it not listed among the 380 sites rated by WMO?
Saunders noted that of the 302 locations cited, the Met Office “Refuse to give me advice” How or where did the so-called “data” for these 103 non-existent websites come from?
The practice of “inventing” temperature data from non-existent sites is a controversial issue in the United States because [federal agency] The U.S. National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA) has [accused of] More than 30% of the information on the reporting websites is false.
Data were retrieved from surrounding sites and the resulting average was assigned an “E” for estimation.
“The addition of ghost station data means NOAA’s monthly and annual reports do not represent reality.” Meteorologist Anthony Watts said. “If this procedure were used in court, the evidence would be discarded because it was contaminated,” he added.
In an open letter to MP Peter Keir, Sanders said he had demonstrated with conclusive evidence that the Met Office was “Obviously fabricated” data.
also, [the Met] Failure to meet high standards of scientific integrity and failure to produce reliable or accurate data for climate reporting purposes from a network of poorly located and poorly maintained sites.
Peter Keir, the minister responsible for the Met Office, has yet to respond to Saunders' allegations.
While the Government, Parliament and the Met Office have remained silent amid a complete lack of interest from the mainstream media, it can only be assumed that the interests of the net zero rollout outweigh any concerns about the underlying scientific data.
To read more, please visit People’s Voice
