The Paris Agreement is usually called the key part of the struggle against climate change, but what makes it so important? What means the process of the Trump administration once again decided to withdraw from the United States from January 20, 2025? It should be remembered that in 2016, President Trump also made the same decision during his first term to disconnect with this global commitment.
At that time, the measure was announced in June 2017, but the decision was made because the United Nations stipulated only on November 20, 2020. On climatic issues, the United States has confidence in the United States and the confidence of leaders.
What is the Paris agreement?
The Paris Agreement passed the level of the UN Climate Change Conference (COP21) on December 12, 2015, and the suction did not exceed 1.5 ° C (2.7 ° F). The goal is designed to reduce the adverse effects of climate change, such as extreme climate events and sea level improvement.
Each country has established its own goals to reduce greenhouse gas emissions suitable for its national environment. These commitments are reviewed and updated regularly to reflect the ambitions reflected in the struggle against climate change.
Trump administration reasons to withdraw from the agreement
The Trump administration violated the defense of the Paris Agreement and believed that this international agreement imposed an unfair economic and regulatory burden on the United States, harming its economy and restricting the competitiveness of the private sector.
According to administrative orders, the United States has achieved economic growth at the same time through national policies that do not hinder economic activities and reduce greenhouse gas emissions. The government argued that these achievements should be a model of other countries, emphasizing that international climate policies should not transfer the funds of US taxpayers to countries that do not need or obtained. In this case, withdrawal is a measure to protect the country's economic interests, promote prosperity and maintain environmental leadership.
The global impact of the US and the Paris Agreement
Gabriel Filippelli, the chief professor of the Department of Earth Science and the Global University of India, to reduce climate change, especially in international cooperation. “This affects the two methods. First, together with the Paris Agreement, countries with lower -income countries provide funds that are suitable for climate and renewable energy for the development of infrastructure, and withdraw from the United States. Such a big country is just discouraging almost global agreements. “
Francescolón emphasizes the global and strategic significance of evacuating from the Paris Agreement in the Paris Agreement, and emphasizes the risk of UU leadership. “The evacuation of the third grade also caused other countries to question its commitment, weakened global impulses, and created a vacuum, so that competitors like China can use its leadership position in the clean energy economy.
List the risk of key legislation of climate elasticity
Filippelli refers to the significance of the Paris agreement, one of the world's largest carbon transmitters in the world. Filippelli explained that administrative orders will have two financial commitments of key legal laws in climatic elasticity. “It may not be important at the domestic level, but what is worrying is that they are now in danger to review and reduce all financial commitment weather in inflation and reduce inflation.”
The importance of governing efforts
Columbus contributed to climate landscape without federal leaders. L. “Despite the lack of federal leaders, NDC or national national level specific contribution.
Federation lacks support for support
Columbus emphasized that in the past, the efforts of the rule have always been essential in the past, but it will be again, but in the long run, there is no consequences of federal support. “These efforts are essential for keeping progress during Trump's first mission and mission period, and it will be critical again. However, extending federal support means a key opportunity to accelerate loss. Trump reverses key climate regulations For example, methane standards and vehicle efficiency rules, and the increase in fossil fuel development. Compared with the current policy, the GHG emissions level increases by 24 % to 36 % compared with the current policy.
Local and state -level climate actions
Filippelli also emphasizes the importance of strengthening state and local strategies without federal support. “We have to have a strategic cooperation with local and state leaders to ensure the efforts of climate actions. We must also explore other organizations and foundations that want to provide funds for climate actions, because the federal plans for such plans for such plans for this kind of plan There will be less support. “