Eric Worrall's paper (Eric Worral) papers
“… They argued that the judge ignored their serious motivation and violated the precedent for decades …”
The Court of Appeals told the court
Lawyers quoted Hannah Arendt and Henry David (Henry David)
Damien Gayle
You 05.02 AEDT, January 30, 2025The philosophy of Hannah Arendt and Henry David Thoreau broadcast on Wednesday in the Court of Appeal because 16 climate activists tried to persuade England's most residents to resist their citizens' resistance. Destroyed behavior to refute their long -term judgment.
Mowing
The appellant sued in four separate trials last year, and appeared in a large -scale appeal in London in a group led by his wife Lady Carr. They argued that the judge violated the precedent for decades and ignored The motivation for their conscience.
After participating in various protests in 2022, they received a verdict from 15 months to five years. This was part of the Just Stop Oil climate movement. The event called for the suspension of oil exploration of Beihai.
Mowing
Among the 16, the co -founder of the extinct rebellion Roger Hallam, but stopped oil, his five -year imprisonment sentenced to five years in prison for obstacles on M25. The longest was published for non -violent protests. Larch Maxey, a three -year tunnel, to the road of Essex refinery. Phoebe Plummer was imprisoned for two years because he sprinkled the tomato soup on the glass on the glass of the National Art Museum.
Mowing
The document submitted by the applicant to the court said: “This is the only example of punishment for peace protesters, and this kind of motivation has not been reduced among this protesters.”
Mowing
Read more: https: ///Law/2025/jan/29/Hannah-and-Henry-david-INVINVID-invoKed-INVOKED-Invoke-Invoke-Invoke-Invoke-invid-invid-invid-invid-Jan Court-Court-Court-Court-Court-Court-Court-Court-Court-By-CLIMATE PROTESTESEST
In my opinion, the actions of protesters far exceed any reasonable definition of acceptable protests. The protesters forcibly forcibly causing chaos to others, causing anger and pain, forcing people to urgently need urgent violence in order to go home or work, and may give life by preventing the roads used to prevent emergency services.
Let's hope that the court's decision made in this case, the court's decision prevented further damage.
Related
Discover more from Watt?
Subscribe to send the latest post to your email.