EPA's “carbon intimidation framework”, also known as “Harm Discovery” (classic case of government over -challenged) Watt?

The first week of President Trump marks a major change in the US climate and energy policy. His government preferentially considered energy independence, revoked heavy regulations, and withdrew from the Paris Climate Agreement, because the cost of US economic costs was not proportional. One of his most result was to return to the danger of the climate policy in the Obama era. Trump's administrative actions emphasized the urgent need to re -visit and revoke this hazardous discovery. The EPA law in 2009 provided the foundation for most of the grand climate agenda of the federal government to drive regulations to increase consumers, damage the cost of the industry, and expand the government to promote the government almost all aspects of life.

According to the “Cleaning Air Law”, the harm is found that the carbon dioxide (CO₂) and the other five greenhouse gases are classified as pollutants. Although the “Cleaning Air Law” was originally aimed at solving smoke, ash and sulfur dioxide, that is, alternatives with direct and direct health effects, this allows EPA to regulate these gases.

However, carbon dioxide is neither toxic nor harmful in the current atmospheric level. It is a natural existence, which is essential to life on the earth, and plays a vital role in plant growth and grain production. By announcing pollutants, EPA has expanded its scope of supervision. This discovery is a foundation for power plants, vehicles, and electrical appliances, and provides the federal government with a license for the micro -management industry and personal choices for the federal government.

In the political and media narrative around climate change, CO₂ was infringed in unfairness. Although Co₂ is indeed a greenhouse, its role in the climate system is far from simple or omnipotent. For example, as far as the potential of warming, water vapor is the most important greenhouse gas. Because its richness in the atmosphere is about half of the greenhouse gas compared with other greenhouse gases, it rarely discusses it because it is because it is because it is because it is because it is because it is because it is because it is because it is because it is because it is because it is. It exceeds the scope of adjustment.

Harm discovery has triggered a series of regulations, which has far -reaching and harmful consequences of consumers, consumers and a wider economy.

1. Energy cost and reliabilityThe
   The regulations of coal and natural gas power plants forced many reliable energy processes and promoted consumers' power costs. Affordable, reliable energy is the cornerstone of economic growth, but these regulations have damaged it.
2. transportationThe
   The vehicle emission standards related to the discovery have increased the price of the car and accelerated the driving force of electric vehicles (EV). Consumers have less choices and higher costs, all of which are in the name of reducing batch emissions.
3. Housing and electrical appliancesThe
   The energy efficiency required by the discovery has improved the cost of house construction and the cost of daily equipment such as refrigerators, water heaters and air conditioners. These authorization usually leads to low or durable product efficiency, which makes the family burden higher to obtain suspicious benefits.
4. Agriculture and food pricesThe
   At present, farmers are facing pressure to reduce methane and nitrogen dioxide emissions, and they have found two other greenhouse gases in danger discovery. These regulations have increased agricultural costs and inevitably pass them to consumers. This has a serious impact on food security and burden.
5. Erosion of personal freedomThe
   The harm discovers that the federal government can break into daily decisions, from the cars you drive to the electrical appliances you use to how you heat your house. Once the individual choice is increasingly authorized by the federal authority, all these options are proven by the necessity of reducing emissions.

This EPA's excessive accidents have damaged ordinary Americans.

One of the biggest defects of the harm is its tunnel vision. By focusing on CO 完 almost completely, it ignores a broader environmental image.

Similarly, the promotion of renewable energy has the disadvantages that are often ignored. Wind energy and solar energy need a large amount of land to destroy the ecosystem and rely on rare materials that cause severe environmental destruction. At the same time, the policies caused by the harm found that low -income families could not be properly damaged, and these families could not absorb energy and food costs.

Harm found that it must be revoked-this is inconsistent with the US values.

President Trump's rolling of climate policy emphasizes the danger of harm, but insufficient progress. In order to truly maintain US energy independence, economic growth and personal freedom, they must cancel harmful discovery. Its foundation is the foundation of shaking, with exaggerated statements and misunderstandings about climate science. Eliminating it will cause the industry to get rid of heavy regulations, reduce the cost of consumers, and restore the balance of environmental decisions.

Development discovery does not mean giving up environmental management. Instead, this will allow more reasonable methods to adopt climate and energy policies-a respect for scientific complexity, avoiding shocking, and considering excessive actual consequences. Balanced policies will give priority to innovation, voluntary efforts and adaptive measures, rather than spare compulsory authorization.

The harm of EPA is found to be better understood as “Carbon intimidation framework”, It represents the seriousness of supervision authority. By announcing carbon dioxide as pollutants, the federal government has applied expensive and far -reaching rules. These rules affect all aspects of life, which will usually damage the economy, personal freedom, and even the environment itself.

The way forward began with the revocation of harm and re -evaluating the role of CO₂ in climate policy. The United States needs a balance, evidence-based method-a priority of innovation, economic freedom and environmental management, and will not succumb to alarmism or ideology. If the policy makers carefully solve the real challenges, then it is time to stay away from carbon panic narrative and rational and practical solutions.

Related