Dear readers, we have always asked you to inform you in time about information about AMOC assumptions. [emphasis, links added]
Recently, we also tell you a new study found Since the 1960s, the stable Atlantic covered. This is not the only one recently.
However, Professor Stefan Rahmstorf of the Potsdam Climate Institute (PIK) is “The second day of the next day“Marine current crashes.
Just in June 2024, he pointed out on X (previously known as Twitter) that AMOC relieves legends “even more dramatic than ever.”
The Guardian recalled the second day after tomorrow after tomorrow. This plot revolves around the collapse of the Great Western Ocean, amoc.https: //t.co/hplrzg77jx
A theme is hotter than ever; I just returned from a three -day seminar.
Current scientific status: https: //t.co/p3fbf4vtuu-Stefan Rahmstorf (@rahmstorf) June 6, 2024
He has always been a series of papers for writers or co -writers, which has also contributed to the plan. He initiated a “open letter” in the fall of 2024 and delivered a huge speech to politicians. We also reported this.
Of course, if there is no comment, the new discovery cannot be passed.
The title “AMOC is slowing, stable, it is slowing down, no, yes …”, he commented on the blog “real climate”, the blog is by scientists, including himself, Gavin Schmidt from NASA, etc. Management.
In short, what he must say is to say: He defended his own way and listed the recent research issues. That's it.
For example, he emphasized that the new climate model (CMIP6) has almost no “his fingerprint”, and any connection between the sea surface of the “warm hole” on the North Atlantic Ocean (see the article here, from January 17, 2025, January 17, 2025 From the beginning), but about four years old CMIP5 Do.
He also questioned whether the new things were more reliable than the old new things. However, the former's efforts are quite large.
He summarized:
I don't think the new method is more reliable than the old method (his author). … However, since we do not have enough measurement value, there are still some uncertainty in this regardMowing“
This is the crux of the problem!
He “does not believe” with honor, but scientific knowledge may be more enough! Yes, everything is uncertain, and “has no exact popularity.”
The famous marine scholar Carl Wunsch also pointed out in a paper published in August 2022:
In the next decades, the entire coupled ocean-atmosphere must be continuously monitored to evaluate the real risks of AMOC collapse, but so far No evidence shows the danger of urgent or overwhelmingEssence “
There are many assumptions, there are many back and forth in science, and they are observed in the day. Many “beliefs” or “non -faith”, that is, Significant signs indicate lack of knowledge.
Therefore, when you (dear readers) told the reader again in the news magazine, “If things are not good, the danger that is about to occur for decades” (see here) or here: “The heating of Europe is weakening, “:careful, People are pretending to be “certainty” that does not exist at all. As I said, this is rarely about hypothetical, belief or non -conviction.
In addition, Professor Rahinsteov was anxious to say: “The Bay Stream System is failing”, not the “Mexico Bay Stream System” that can be “some extent, somewhere, somewhere,” the stall, northern branch, AMOC may be stable in stability. Or no, or not (according to his own blog title).
Due to the measurement before 2004, AMOC is still in a good health today. These are the actual “difficult facts”.
We should eventually stop scaring the Play in the Atlantic Ocean, and it is an enlightened citizen like you, dear readers.
(Translation from the original translation of Klimanachright)
Read more in no technical area
