Climate law is a urgent threat to our high -quality life, but the recent court judgment provides inspiring signals for consumers and energy providers. [emphasis, links added]
In recent months, three judges in Maryland and New York have rejected a weird lawsuit of billions of dollars in climate change.
If it is successful, these lawsuits will enable left -wing cities such as San Francisco or Bolt, Colorado to formulate energy policies for the entire country.
The left -wing climate activist cannot obtain support for the idea of the US public, and has shifted to the court to achieve their ideological goals.
The use of the national “public nourishment” and fraud law, they demand high compensation amount and forced providers to pay their unwelling and expensive climatic agenda and infrastructure plans.
Auditer deliberately filed a lawsuit with the areas of sympathy, avoided parliament to impose a large -scale expenditure project, and hoped to formulate a national climate policy.
What projects are we talking about? Imagine that your city purchased a new snow sweeping fleet. Imagine that your neighbor was re -used as a “15 -minute city”.
All social projects will be funded by climate legal.
If it sounds not democratic, it is because.
In addition to trampled our federal structure and the willingness of the American people, these efforts can also prevent these companies from fully carried out business, thereby increasing consumers' energy prices, and we may terminate the fossil fuel industry. We know that Essence
This means that Americans will no longer care about whether their devices work effectively, but whether they can fully open the equipment.
When seeking energy independence in the United States to protect their benefits from the infringement of bad actors from all over the world, this is the national security that threatens our national security because of the leftist of the climate obsessed.
The good news is that so far, the court is opposed to bloodthirsty climate activists.
In New York City, Baltimore, and Annapolis and Annie Allender County suffered a series of eye -catching losses.
Their core claims that companies such as Exxon Mobil, BP, Shells, CITGO and Chevron have misleaded their products' contributions to climate change.
In each case, the lawsuit was rejected.
The judge listed the ridiculous nature of accusing the company's deception, and pointed out that federal laws, not state law, ruled climate and global pollution regulations.
Federal regulations and constitutions are clear. Congress and its designated agencies have formulated energy policies for our country, rather than left -wing lawyers who work for Honolulu.
These decisions are the victory of the American people and our federal government system. In addition, the trend shows that the last desperate attempt of climate activist may fail like everyone.
Unfortunately, climate warriors have filed two similar lawsuits. But the recent decision shows that climate warriors are in a bad year.
Read in the town and rest
