The summary is a fact check on the media's most serious false claims about climate change in January 2025. [emphasis, links added]
Anti-narrative reality and anti-reality narrative
January is busy tracking the first step of President Trump's demolition Federal government climate Leviathan. It was also a very cold month, that's What will this version of climate fact check cover.
According to relatively unmanipulated NASA satellite data, It is estimated that compared with January 2025, the composition indicator of “average global temperature” has dropped significantly by 0.34°C.
Although the atmospheric carbon dioxide increased from about 422 portions per million (ppm) in January 2024 to 426 portions in January 2025.
The growth of 4 ppm of carbon dioxide is worth about 78 billion tons. As a result, the carbon dioxide in the atmosphere increased by 78 billion tons, making January 0.34°C cooler than the previous month.
February is usually the coldest average month in the northern hemisphere. January 2025 is cooler than February 2016, the same as January 1998 and February 1998, with hundreds of billions of tons of carbon dioxide and a decade of “warming”.
Facing the anti-narrative reality of NASA satellite data, The desperate climate scam machine has produced an anti-realistic narrative, claiming January is the hottest ever in this Associated Press report.
The Associated Press story is based on the EU’s Copernicus climate change service, which is estimated to be warmer in January 2025 than in January 2024.
Who do you believe? Please remember There is no such physical location and “average global temperature” That “Metric” is just a guess Invented for climate scams NASA satellite data may be more credible.
NASA satellite data is based on an estimate of a data type – satellite measurement of atmospheric brightness.
Copernicus, by contrast, is estimated to be a black box of surface temperature data that dates back to 1940 and European satellite data.
Since urban heat island effects damage the readings of temperature stations, surface temperature data can be very inaccurate and upward bias.
How surface data is merged with satellite data is also an unsettling mystery. We are using counternarratives of NASA satellite data to better measure reality.
We will end this month, pointing out that President Trump directs the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) and the White House Office of Management and Budget by executive orders Begin to rethink the EPA's infamous 2009 “hazard discovery”, This determines that carbon dioxide and other greenhouse gases can harm public health and welfare.
Hazard discovery is key to nearly all federal government activities on climate change.
We expect it to be abolished.
Read more in Climate Realism
