Sorry, CNN, does not need a “bull fart” vaccine, or will it stop climate change – what about Watt?

From the climateRealism

linnea Lukeen

A recent article by CNN, “How the Cow Fart Vaccine Helps Respond to Climate Change”, discusses vaccines being developed to reduce the amount of methane produced by their digestive process. Hopefully the vaccine will significantly reduce livestock emissions, thereby slowing down climate change. Won't. Methane from livestock contributes little to global warming. As a result, attempts to change the biological processes of these animals seem to far outweigh any possible benefits.

CNN explains that methane is produced as grass fermentation in the rumen and claims it is more “effective” than carbon dioxide, but does admit it is relatively short in the atmosphere. Author Jacapo Prisco continues to claim: “Life livestock accounts for about one-third of human-related methane emissions, which account for 30% of global warming.”

The CNN authors here misunderstood the claims about methane, or intentionally mislead the readers. The author cited the International Energy Agency (IEA) as the source of his claim on methane emissions in livestock. The IEA does say methane is estimated to be the cause of 30% of global warming, which acknowledges that it is open. What does it do no But saying that methane livestock emissions are 30% of the 30% warming, that's what Prisco's claim suggests. Livestock emissions are only a small part of methane emissions attributed to human causes, and overall global methane emissions are less. It is also important to note that the IEA estimates of anthropogenic (anthropogenic) methane emissions are much higher than most official government assessments. To be clear, the IEA is not a scientific organization, but rather creates an institution that evaluates global energy supply, stocks and future demands – in recent years it has deviated from its mission of becoming an advocate for climate activity and legislation.

EPA data suggests that beef production accounts for only 2% of all U.S. greenhouse gas emissions, with only a portion of which comes from the digestion process of cattle. This is worth noting, especially since the United States produces more beef and veal than any other country. By comparison, crop production produces 10% of all U.S. greenhouse gas emissions. Assume that the rest of the world is the same.

William Happer, a physicist at Princeton University, Ph.D. The forced increase in methane per year is one-tenth of carbon dioxide (30/300).” Based on this fact, scientists concluded:[p]Due to fear of fear, strict restrictions on methane emissions are not proven to be justified. ”

As Climate Realism For example, in other cases, as discussed here and here, for example, methane has limited capacity and can make meaningful contributions to warming meaningfully, since most of the energy absorption bands affected by gas have been already evaporated by water vapor. cover, and water vapor forms. A large part of the greenhouse gases in the atmosphere.

As a result, methane has little to do with global warming. The current concentration is about 1.9 parts per million (ppm). For comparison, the atmosphere contains 18 ppm neon lights and 426 ppm CO₂.

CNN reported that the vaccine discussed in the story does not exist yet, it is being studied at the Pilbright Institute in the UK and has been working for more than a decade by various research organizations, with no “real results”.

Side effects of the animal have been hypothesized, such as “reducing the amount of feed that the rumen can absorb, which means cattle may need more food and increase farmers’ costs.” In a world where hunger is still too common, making livestock less processed food To be energy and mass is a bad idea.

It seems that the digestive process of livestock and the role of methane production in it are still rarely understood. Given that methane production may be a basic step in the digestive process of rumen animals, including livestock, such as livestock, sheep and goats, it is crucial to understand the importance of methane in the digestion process before tampering with methane in futile efforts. Work in vain to mitigate climate change. This is especially true given that efforts to control livestock emissions are a solution to the problem, there is no obvious benefit to the world and no consequences for the animals involved.

CNN misleads readers by hyping up the impact of methane emissions on global temperatures and the amount of contributions to livestock. Data show that all agriculture, especially livestock production, has little impact on the global climate.