Mistakes, politics, climate change does not threaten the survival of the EU, but climate policy does – what about Watt?

From the climateRealism

linnea Lukeen

Recent political articles, “Climate change threatens the survival of the EU, warns the German security report,” claiming: “Global warming will intensify global conflicts, conflicts between hunger and immigration, with increasing risks to Europe.” Evidence undermines These claims. In fact, as Politico briefly mentioned, the world has not suffered from destabilization of climate change due to climate change, but the European population is more likely to suffer from climate policy.

Politico reported a “landmark” political report from the German Federal Intelligence Agency (BND) that sought to assess the “hazards that climate change poses to German and European security over the next 15 years”. The report concluded that “the instability of climate change will drive higher immigration and food prices, threatening economic and political unrest” and “the inequality effects of rising EU temperatures – attacks in southern countries suffer less than others Much – Risks can split Brock. Transparent

Politico continues to claim that as the global average temperature rises, “the same is true of the frequency, severity and intensity of extreme rainfall caused by floods, deadly heat waves, drought that destroys harvests and conditions that make wildfires prone to spread.”

These claims are wrong, as evidenced by the available data.

Although the northern latitudes are less rainfall, including EU member states, there is no extreme rainfall that causes flooding. What claims that the recent flood events were “pressurized” or worsened by climate change is pure speculation based on attribution modeling. Data and historical records of flood frequency and severity are unprecedented claims of flooding. For example, recent floods in Spain are attributed to climate change by attributive groups, but the storms hit by Spain are consistent with a long history of storms similar to that of storms that have not become more severe or frequent. exist Climate Realism Post, “Facts of flooding with climate hysteria: BBC ignores Spain’s weather history,” meteorologists Anthony Watts and H. Sterling Burnett describe the history of flood-shaking areas:

Valencia sits at the mouth of the Turia River in the Mediterranean, for example, before the warmth of 127, 67, 67 and 28 years ago , the temperature was cooler at that time. Compared to the present.

…

As Caroline Angus revealed about the 1957 Valencia Flood, these conditions are neither new nor unprecedented. The BBC focuses on “climate change” and warmer atmospheres, the main reason for recent flooding, overlooking the atmospheric mechanics behind these storms and downplaying recurrence patterns similar to natural events.

Similarly, Climate Realism Other European regional flood events are exposed here.

Heat waves and droughts are also getting worse, opposition politics and German reports claim that crop yields in Europe have not declined due to these circumstances, as many conditions have pointed out Climate Realism For example, here, here and here posts. Wildfires are also declining worldwide.

Interestingly, the report from Politico and Germany does admit that the government's response to climate shockism may also cause tension. Politico reported that policies aimed at addressing climate change “will cause tensions, pointing out that carbon pricing, the backbone of EU climate efforts, will have a disproportionate impact on poor households.” This fact should be obvious to anyone. Carbon pricing won't bother the elite who can afford higher energy prices.

Politico and the report authors also warn of the “cost of decarbonization and its (perceived) unfair distribution…providing space for populism, right-wing and left-wing extremism, as well as disinformation movements[.]transparent

The claim should be further proposed, it has caused tensions and contributed to an increasing threat to European food supply, leading to large-scale protests by farmers in multiple countries. Not only that, but not a view on unfair distribution of costs, this is a fact. In addition to the carbon tax, the push for electric vehicles is a subsidy for luxury products that most people cannot afford. London's “ultra-low emission zone” (Ulez) is basically a tax on the poor who cannot buy new electric or low-emission hybrids.

For Europe, and for other major crop production in the world, the same is true of Europe, so climate change is not driving or potentially driving large-scale migrations that could destabilize Europe. Climate realism debunks the claim that climate change is causing mass migration in multiple positions, such as here, here and here.

If politicians and German leaders fear “populism” and the tendency to sympathize in their countries arise due to concerns about mass immigration from unstable areas of the world, then perhaps they can impose restrictions on immigration without blame for climate change.

It is shameful that Politico and the German government underestimated the harm of unnecessary, unreasonable climate policies they supported to Europeans. Extreme weather won't worsen, but in the name of climate change, the impact of government overextension and taxation is.