Guest “That's it, this is the Bay of America”, David Middleton
BOEM's OCS Region
Our Mission: Manage the development of shelf energy, mineral and geological resources in an environmentally and economically responsible manner outside the United States.
The U.S. Bay Area (GOAR) manages three programs on the U.S. Gulf Outer Shelf (OCS): oil and gas, renewable energy and marine minerals. GOAR manages offshore resources in federal waters offshore Texas, Louisiana, Mississippi, Alabama and Florida. Nearly three-quarters of the Gulf of the United States are scientists, including geologists, geophysicists, petroleum engineers, physicists, biologists, environmental protection experts and environmental scientists.
What is the Bay of America?
The Continental Shelf Land Act (OCSLA) grants Boem the authority to manage OCS and the requirements to provide environmental oversight. The Gulf remains the country's main offshore source Oil and gasabout 97% of the U.S. OCS oil and gas production. OCS activities earn considerable revenue from rental sales, production royalties and rental fees. These funds are distributed to the U.S. Treasury Department and several different programs through various income sharing laws. The biggest part is the Treasury General Fund, which benefits all U.S. citizens by funding the day-to-day operations of the federal government.
Boem has the first ever sea Wind energy In 2023, an auction in the OCS Bay area in the United States led to a high price of $5.6 million for a rental area. RWE Offser Us Gulf, LLC is the winner of the Lake Charles rental area, which has the potential to generate about 1.24 GW of offshore wind and electricity and uses clean, renewable energy homes.
this Marine minerals It is planned to work with the community to address severe erosion along the country's coastal beaches, dunes, barrier islands and wetlands. Erosion can affect natural resources, energy, defense, public infrastructure and tourism. To help solve this problem, MMP rents sand, gravel and/or shell resources from federal waters on the OCS to protect coastal conservation, beach nutrition and wetland recovery, and conducts strong safety and environmental oversight.
Bureau of Ocean Energy Administration (BOEM)
More good news!
Boem abolishes whale conservation efforts to expand rice
Release date 02/20/2025
Contact Brian Walch
Phone (202) 710-7994
The Bureau of Ocean Energy Administration (BOEM) today announced its revocation to the lessee and operator (NTL) 2023-G01, Expanded Whale Conservation efforts at Rice during consultation with NMFS [National Marine Fisheries Service]. NTL made recommendations for recommended preventive measures for lessees and operators during the re-consultation period.
NTL was cancelled in response to Secretary's order 3418 Unleash American energy.
Information about NTLS is available on Boem's Guide Portal: https://www.boem.gov/about-boem/regions-guidance/guidance-portal.
– Pohim –
The Department of the Interior Bureau of Marine Energy Administration (BOEM) manages Outer Continental Shelf (OCS) energy, minerals and geological resources in an environmentally and economically responsible manner.
Bohemian
The Biden administration attempts to illegally remove the “whale extension area of rice” from all future rental sales (the dark blue area on the picture below).
The whales of rice are located primarily in the yellow and rear overview areas of the eastern Gulf of Mexico, a restricted area for oil and gas exploration. By 2021, rice whales are considered to be local subgroups that do not belong to Brad whales.
Now, the US offshore oil and gas industry has been “not close to one's body”…
Biden: I want to “stop all drilling” on the coast, the bay is blocked by the court
Ian Hanchett August 8, 2023
In an interview with the Weather Channel, which will air Tuesday, President Joe Biden said he “wanted to stop all drilling on the East Coast, the West Coast and the Bay” but was blocked by the court.
[…]
Breitbart
The court battle will continue. EnviroMarxist instigators have been forums and judges shopping to conduct more nuisance lawsuits before districts and judges have long records of industry and capitalism in general. But unlike the past four years, the federal government will actively defend the law and we don't have to rely on APIs, Noia, Louisiana and Chevron to fight back. We can only hope that the Supreme Court will eventually figure out that these NGOs have no position to prosecute anyone on behalf of the Earth. The current Supreme Court may simply tend to deny the agitator’s position.
Abstract
The topic of this article is not a happy topic. Until recently, the court's environmental rulings over the past fifty years reflect the views of its consistently conservative majority, but are still adjusted by moderately conservative judges who have received pragmatic attention and are both open and open in context. There are enabled environmental protection to resolve environmental protection emergencies. Case. However, this dynamic has changed a lot over the past few years, as the majority of the courts are increasingly captured by the justices I call the “Constitutional Alert” – through their shared view, voting and reasoning motivated them that their special threat to environmental law is no less than bills. How to formulate and apply the constitutional basis of the law.
The purpose of this article is to describe this disturbing development while putting it from a historical perspective. To this end, this article is divided into three parts. The first part highlights the main reasons why environmental legislation is so challenging for our legislatures, including the Supreme Court. As stated in Part I, the formulation and application of environmental protection law systematically raises the courts about the difficulties in the distribution of legislative authorization between the Constitution and between the levels of government and the bill of rights. The second part considers how the courts usually resolve these legal issues from fifty years starting in October 1970, until the dawn of modern American environmental law directly added his first chapter to the court in late October 2019. Three justices. It describes how and why there is some balance in the court's environmental rulings over the fifty years despite the ongoing conservative majority. at last, The third section considers the court's environmental ruling since the fall of 2020, when the court became ruled by six judges, who were shocked by their view that the threat of environmental legislation, which constitutes the foundation of the constitution, incorporated the majority viewpoints that Revealed the success of environmental law and past success and past success and eroded its future commitment.
Lazarus, 2024
“Constitutional Alert”? Do you just like it when smug leftists come up with phrases like “a pathetic basket” or “the only trash I see is his supporters”…
Thank you Professor Lazarus for adding a “constitutional alert” to the growing list of unintentional compliments of the left, for the hard-working Americans! This pathetic trash is now a proud constitutional danger! It's great to read all the Federalist papers written by James Madison, and I'm sure our federal government should be run by constitutional alerts.
President Trump may have the opportunity to replace Thomas (76) and Alito (74) with young “constitutional alarmists” (hopefully more like Gorsuch than Cavanaugh). He or his successor JD Vance may even have a chance to replace Justice Sotomayor (70) and Chief Justice Roberts (70).
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/3e2e4/3e2e4d65985e42a32dd5a39d5f2f3f1834213646" alt=""
refer to
Lazarus, Richard, the Rise of Constitutional Alerts of the Supreme Court and its Foresight on the Future of Environmental Law 85 Ohio St. LJ ____ (to be published soon in 2024) (July 13, 2024) . Harvard University Public Law Work Documents are about to be released and available on SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=4893459 or http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.4893459
Related
Discover more from Watt?
Subscribe to send the latest posts to your email.