Hazardous hazard discoveries in 2009 have been the cornerstone of false climate regulations after the Environmental Protection Agency declared carbon dioxide and other greenhouse gas hazardous pollutants. [emphasis, links added]
It hinders economic growth and destroys livelihoods, which is due to rulemaking, which puts ideology ahead of science.
The EPA has the right to impose comprehensive restrictions on greenhouse gas emissions from all human activities, and the EPA is free to make unreasonable demands on power generation, transportation, manufacturing and agriculture.
Under the leadership of the Obama and Biden administrations, this regulation of cudgel, especially coal, is focused on carbon dioxide emissions.
Over the past decade, regulations have led to the closure of more than 40% of coal-fired power plants in the country, one of the most economical and reliable generators.
Unemployment has affected thousands of factory workers, coal miners and supportive employees, and electricity prices and power outage risks have also increased.
The hazard discovery is a response to the Supreme Court’s ruling in the 2007 Massachusetts decision that the EPA has the right to provide for greenhouse gases under the Clean Air Act if the EPA jeopardizes the public.
Based on flawed analysis, The Obama administration's EPA concluded that such threats lay the foundation for some of the agency's most important regulations.
Hazard discovery affects clean energy programs nationwide, affordable clean energy rules and strict vehicle emission standards.
Countries pointed out regulations that defend their climate initiatives. California defends stricter vehicle emission standards with its exemption.
Northeast states rely on it to maintain a regional greenhouse gas initiative for capping and trade programs.
Under President Biden, the EPA imposed stricter regulations on power plants and cars last year to reach “net zero emissions” by 2050. Critics say there is no feasible technology to meet power plant emission limits.
EPA ignores the feasibility of technical “solutions”.
Hazard discovery ignores the complexity of climate dynamics from solar cycles, clouds and ocean currents, and relies on computer models that include empirical data, which have proven to be wrong.
Even the quality of global temperature records is too poor to support this rule.
Science has determined that the warming potential of carbon dioxide decreases as its atmospheric concentration increases.
Although frequently cited by proponents of the rule, no link between warming and increased weather has been found. As time goes by, the weather keeps getting worse.
Of all the absurdities of the rules, none of them is greater than the claim that carbon dioxide is a pollutant that catastrophically overheated the Earth.
Science has determined that the warming potential of carbon dioxide decreases as its atmospheric concentration increases.
This reduced return phenomenon means that even doubling the amount of carbon dioxide from current levels will only have a moderate effect on temperature.
“Models that predict carbon dioxide doom have always overestimated warming, but EPA continues to rely on them to justify its regulations.” Judith Curry said one of many climate scientists questioned the regulation.
EPA also cannot solve the benefits of carbon dioxide. As NASA affirms, higher levels have improved plant growth and agricultural productivity through fertilization, a factor in the greening of the planet over the past few decades.
This greatly improves global food security.
EPA has discarded EPA brushing the huge contribution of hydrocarbons to grow over the past 250 years through industrialization and modern agriculture.
Coal, oil and gas are crucial to the economic development of poor countries and people's support.
Mr. Trump's EPA administrator Lee Zeldin has reportedly made suggestions to the White House about abandoning dangerous discoveries.
Given the scientific shortcomings of the EPA’s “greenhouse” rules, the time for the abolition is over. The EPA should acknowledge that the two pounds of carbon dioxide exhaled every day on a daily basis are not threatening to the public and should not be treated like this.
This will suppress the pseudoscience of women fearing, pseudoscience of the United Nations and the anti-human activists, and allow the restoration of common sense and scientific integrity to fit into a free society.
Read more in The Washington Times
