The defeated Joe Biden administration has made the fury that has been handed over to a startup related to Stacey Abrams is justified. But this is not surprising. Climate spending at Biden’s White House is always political. [emphasis, links added]
In 2022, President Joe Biden uses longtime Democrat John Podesta to oversee $375 billion in payments for climate-related initiatives, plans included in the dishonest Inflation Reduction Act.
The funds were supposed to be spent on projects that would push the country to reduce carbon production by 40% to 2030 levels towards Democrats’ goal.
In fact, these funds have built huge mud funds in the White House, when Podesta could boost the Democratic Party’s prospects in 2024.
When Podesta was appointed, Biden's domestic climate adviser Gina McCarthy left the White House. Perhaps she refused to turn what would have been an important tool against climate change into an important tool for the political magic wand.
Left-leaning media tried to make Podesta appointments more beautiful.
The New York Times called him “a veteran of the Obama administration's climate strategy,” but also highlighted Podesta's political credentials, including being the chief of staff of Bill Clinton, Hillary Clinton's 2016 campaign chair, and founder of the Center for American Progress, the left-handed think tank.
Most relevant, Podesta was brought into “a second difficult second term to help President Barack Obama”; In 2022, Podesta was brought in another rescue mission after retirement as Biden's approval rating collapsed.
In August 2024, the White House issued a fact sheet touting its achievements, especially “over $265 billion in clean energy investment.”
However, these investments are not limited to cleaning up the air or reducing our dependence on fossil fuels.
“According to the Treasury Department's analysis, 75% of private sector clean energy investment flows to counties with lower than the median household income…” The White House report said:
They declared that “the inflation reduction bill is the largest investment in environmental justice in history.” Investing aims at communities “salaries, incomes, employment rates and college graduation rates below average…”
Some recipient areas are allegedly selected to offset damage caused by closure of coal mines to replace lost jobs in the energy transition. But a map shows that many abandoned states and counties were also eliminated for benefits.
Are these counties especially important in minorities, and for Democrats? Are they useful in picking votes?
Of course, investing in Arizona, Nevada, Michigan, and many other states cited on the government-provided maps suggests their ability to choose and choose.
Have they done this? We cannot say for sure, but given that Podesta is in the hands of the tiller, we will assume that the beneficiaries of the IRA are carefully selected for their political interests.
A project called Solar, with all progress similar goals, is part of Biden’s “Justice 40 Initiative”, which determines Of some federal climate and clean energy investments, 40% flows to “communities that are disadvantaged due to underinvestment and pollution burden.”
You understand that because Podesta hopes voters can, too. It was no accident when the White House touted billions of dollars in solar investments (including the Libra solar project in Nevada), a key swing state, two months before last year’s election.
Of course, it's not just about building a solar project or distributing Podesta's carefully planned tax credits.
The driving force of electric vehicles is arguably creating many automatic workers on Biden’s climate agenda, which requires Detroit automakers to be effective Abandoning to make profitable and popular cars in favor of electric cars. To compensate and retain his approval, Biden’s White House has rushed to support the industry in a situation where Michigan’s swing state is crucial.
Last July, the government announced a $334.8 million investment to convert the Stellantis' Belvidere, Illinois Assembly plant into building electric vehicles and components. The electric vehicle project is so fragile that the Department of Energy donated $1.7 billion to convert 11 auto factories in eight states to make it float.
Despite their best efforts, the White House was unable to burn $375 billion, which brought us to former Georgia Rep. Stacey Abrams.
The leaked video from the Veritas project revealed an EPA adviser who said Biden’s Appartatchiks was so worried that President Trump or Congress would ask for a return of unpaid payments, that They eradicated what was left behind, described the fanatical spread of funds, throwing “gold bars away from the Titanic.”
EPA consultant Brent Efron said that usually his department has been proposing “proper procedures to prevent fraud and prevent abuse” but is throwing money at tribes, nonprofits and states in a frantically “Because it’s a government-run program, it’s hard, so if Trump wins the money, they might take it away.”
One of those gold bars landed on a circle of a startup group tied with Stacey Abrams, two failed candidates for Georgia Governor and Denier ongoing elections.
The nonprofit, Power Forward community is the creative idea of several left-wing pro-gunner groups. In 2023, it reported revenues exactly $100. Abrams is senior legal counsel for Rewiring America, one of the founding groups and boasts about her support for the Power Forward initiative.
Zeldin said in an interview with the funds,
“When we learned about the Biden administration’s plan to quickly park $20 billion outside agencies, we suspect that some organizations were created with thin air just to take advantage of that.”
It seems he is right.
One billion dollars is a huge sum of money. The fact that the White House intentionally “hides” and potentially abuses these funds and more needs to be investigated.
“The days of irresponsible shoveling cash to left-wing activist groups in the name of environmental justice and climate equality are over,” Zeldin said in a video posted on X.
Let us hope.
Read more on Fox News
