Trump defeats the core of the climate change agenda by attacking CO2 “pollution” claims – Watt?

Daily Skeptics

Chris Morrison

The 8 billion people living on Earth breathe two pounds of carbon dioxide a day, but net zero fanatics have long believed that this gas in all planetary life is a pollutant. While all observable evidence dates back at least 600 million years, activists have raised gas levels to out-of-control high temperatures and cemented a politically inspired story that shows that humans control a chaotic and nonlinear climate. Their computer model tells them, especially when providing all the correct data. A crucial cornerstone of all this nonsense is the “hazard discovery” of the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA), which was called CO in 2009₂ A “pollutant” called clean air. Pollution panic is influential around the world and is used to defend countless regulations and bans. The massive nature of this discovery is perhaps not surprising, the Trump administration has not spent a long time at the core of the green spots, and the new EPA chief reportedly urged the White House to revoke the ruling.

Back in 2007, the EPA accused greenhouse gases of “hiding public health and public welfare for current and future generations.” It said that under the Clean Air Act, automobile emissions cause “air pollution” of greenhouse gases, endangering public health and welfare. Science was doubtful at that time, and now it is even more cunning.

Just like medical affairs on covid, so net zero, Daily suspicion There has always been a keen and investigative interest in basic science supporting any major political action program. It is obvious that any acceptance of humans is a common acceptance₂ Unable to control the climate thermostat will cause the entire zero net building, especially cherished by the control frenzy on the left, falling like a house of cards. Like Covid, the need to keep the population present with panic means doing everything possible to close the debate in the mainstream.

Carbon dioxide is a so-called greenhouse gas that has the properties of warming in the atmosphere. But it has long been known that these characteristics decrease with higher atmosphere volumes, an observation that explains why levels in the past were more than 10 times higher, and global temperature runaways have not been recorded in the past. Plants have evolved to reproduce in CO₂ The amount is three times the current level of exposure. About CO₂ Double in the atmosphere, estimated to range from “saturation” around 0.5°C to shocking claims of 10°C or more. Many computer models are intentionally fed “pathways” that assume that future temperatures are very high and can better produce clickbait stories of imaginary climate “tip” points.

Because no one knows what the correct number is, although much evidence points to a decrease, even negligible, it is reasonable to point out the assumption that humans control major climate change by releasing CO (view)₂ No scientific paper has been unproven to verify the claim. It is for this reason that political activists invented the lie that an overwhelming consensus on artificial warming, and that science is hereby “settled”. Not only is it considered settled, but any further discussion may be compared to the Jewish massacre that denies Nazi Germany. From time to time, some idiots can be relied on to show that the denier should be sent to prison. As a result, helpers of mainstream media can promote the wonderful concept that the world can do, that is, what the world can do, rather than relying on the breeze and sunlight, is supported by control and lifestyle, and is more suitable for pre-industrial and civilized eras of lesser-age age.

This is the basic stupidity behind net zero, coupled with the increasing amount of “settled” science based on models and junk data, which is so surprising that it is so rapid in the U.S. and elsewhere. Unlike Trump 1.0, Donald's latest incarnation is long in the plan. The entire Woke agenda, including zero net (including zero net), suffered a tough attack and devastating precision. The EPA's hazard discovery is the “holy grail” of the climate agenda, noting Climate warehouse. “If you want to permanently undermine the U.S. climate agenda, you have to rely on its core,” he wrote. “It’s core.”

There are still some ways to delete CO₂ Hazards are found because it is related to the Clean Air Act. In addition to administrative litigation, changes in the law may also require the prevention of inevitable litigation funded by an almost unlimited amount of funds provided by the still powerful green spots. But Republican Congress hearings could help clear the air and identify the actual “hazards” of artificially induced CO₂ Gift. Recommendations about CO₂ Risks are everywhere in original EPA discovery, but more scientific information can now be provided about the “risks” that natural gas poses. It's becoming increasingly difficult to argue₂ This is a clear and current danger when some extra warmth saves lives and increases food supply, while in recent years, natural gas itself has allowed global foliage growth to reach up to 15%. The activists will undoubtedly claim that there are more extreme weather now, such as hurricanes, floods, droughts and wildfires, which may be hampered by the almost complete lack of evidence to support their argument.

Chris Morrison is Daily suspicion' Environment editing.

Related