Wow, who knows setting crazy and arbitrary emission targets to “net zero” would be a totally futile exercise, huh? [emphasis, links added]
In the February 28 project, climate-obsessed Reuters has a red moment in a February 28th episode “The pursuit of zero carbon emissions has been a huge failure.”
For the socket that once advocated the Nobel Peace Prize and gave it to Greta Thunberg, who is the teenage ecological community, it must be a pill that is difficult to swallow.
Reuters acknowledged,[d]Trillions of dollars spent on renewable energy, and hydrocarbons still account for over 80%According to the Energy Institute, a new label for the world's major energy sources has been opened, and the same share of energy consumption recently. ”
Coal, oil and gas production was a “record high.” According to Reuters, Coal, Oil and Gas production was “a record high.”
Ultimately, Reuters comes to the obvious situation, and there are benefits. But before Reuters did this, the meaningless nature of this economic mobility standard had spread in the Ether quarter.
As Marc Morano, founder of Climate Warehouse, told MRC Business in June 2024, “Net zero on the climate agenda is actually a central plan in the Soviet style. Every sector of our economy needs to plan remotely to achieve net zero.”
Even by left-wing standards, net zero emissions have been speculated to be almost nothing.
The then-Secretary of State under President Barack Obama Kerry admitted at the 2015 UN Conference on Climate Change (COP21): “If all industrial countries drop to zero emissions – remember, what I just said, all industrial countries will drop to zero emissions, which would not be enough.”
No joke. Of course, Reuters did not re-spread Kerry's comments in its latest article. But the media does admit The huge push to renewable energy does not necessarily lead to lower costs for consumers:
Solar and wind power generation account for only 3.5% of original energy production. Leveling costs of renewable energy For years it was a measure of the net modern value of electricity generated in a factory throughout its lifetime. But this did not result in lower electricity prices. In fact, electricity prices tend to rise as the share of energy mix provided by renewable energy rises. That's because wind and solar energy are intermittent. Since storing energy in a battery is uneconomical, traditional sources of electricity are still needed as backup, which is expensive.
Thank you very much, the captain is obvious!
Hover agency visits Bjorn Lomborg to tell Fox Business Host Larry Kudlow in 2021 Even for the next seventy years, the U.S. president followed the extremist emissions policy of then-President Joe Biden, “this would be a trivial reduction in temperature.”
Lomburg says Reduction is just a pointless “0.07°Fahrenheit. This is through the UN climate model. So it will be very difficult. It will be very expensive. It has little impact.”
The famous Lomburg,”[Y]Have you never solved historical problems by telling people “Can you endure less?” “You're just talking about this.” Can you please – you know – celebrate your Fourth of July in a way you hate it?” ”
Apparently, given that the concept draws it out of net zero equity by October 2024, for example, Wood Mackenzie said.
Read more in Newsbusters
