During the first few weeks of his tenure, President Donald Trump has been busy strengthening the energy choices and reasons for freedom for American citizens. [emphasis, links added]
One of his first formal actions was to withdraw us from the Paris Climate Agreement, a unilateral agreement that imposes severe and unfair restrictions on the United States.
Trump has formed a new National Energy Commission led by Home Secretary Doug Burgum, which is accused of streamlining energy permits, expanding gas and oil exploration, and establishing a global U.S. “energy advantage.”
Then, to address the first day of our 47th President, he signed an executive order to eliminate Biden’s “Electric Vehicle Authorization,” a shorthand for a series of subsidies and regulations designed to manually enhance demand for electric vehicles.
Some of these measures, such as returning the EV tax credit, require Congressional action at some point.
Furthermore, even if Republicans control both houses of Congress, those who disagree with energy options and Trump’s energy freedom movement still have many options to push their “green” agenda forward.
One side door strategy is to use the “blue state” legislature to promote policies that have little chance of passing Congress. Vermont and New York have passed the Climate Superfund legislation, and are waiting for similar bills in other states.
Of the contribution of a particular company to the damage caused by climate change, it is at best a vague effort, and at worst.
As climate policy analyst Paul Driessen pointed out, Climate activists are happy to “blame fossil fuels, cold, cold, hurricanes, wildfires (including caused by arsonists, power companies and poor forest management), Floods, droughts and abuse of husbands.transparent
Science tells us [Earth’s climate] It has been changing since our planet bypasses the sun. There is only common sense, at least the current changes in our climate may be caused to some extent by human activities.
The truth is, however, that no one knows exactly the importance of this part, and that anyone who claims that otherwise has not provided a personal opinion disguises it as a factual analysis.
If the left cannot enforce what it calls “green” policies by working with friendly state governments, The radical climate movement can always be used for climate control judges “forum shops” and “forum shops”, willing to fight fossil fuel companies with huge penalties.
Some of these lawsuits accuse fossil fuel companies of deceptively undermining the highly politicized scientific “consensus” of climate change, even though this particular strategy fails to withstand much results.
For example, on February 5, a New Jersey judge (appointed by former Democratic Governor Jon Corzine) abandoned a case filed by the state’s Democratic attorney general, marking the fourth consecutive loss of climate litigation.
If everything else fails, the radical climate movement may place its hopes in a new wave of European climate imperialism.
… Rather than admitting failure, [EU] Try to force Our The economy becomes hardened like they do.
Unlike previous iterations, this imperialism does not involve conquerors or the overseer of the colonial stencils, but rather relies on the massive and liberal bureaucracy of the EU, In May, the company adopted the Corporate Sustainability Due Diligence Directive (CSDDD), which threatens U.S. companies to be punished if they do not meet European climate standards.
In September, a group of Republican lawmakers sent an alarm in a letter to then-Treasury Secretary Janet Yellen.
“The extraterritorial scope of CSDDD is a serious violation of U.S. sovereignty and a direct threat to U.S. companies' global competitiveness,” they wrote.
“We are very worried [Biden-Harris] The administration is taking regulatory responsibilities to European officials, Allow them to impose severe social and climate policies on U.S. companies.transparent
As you go beyond climate rhetoric, it’s obvious what’s going on here. Europe has put itself in energy and economic stagnation and has failed to keep pace with the more dynamic U.S. economy.
But abandoning those cherished “green” regulations would mean admitting that their technocratic projects have failed.
Therefore, instead of admitting failure, they tried to force Our The economy becomes hardened like they do. This way, the EU can also eat its recognized smaller cakes.
Although radical climate movements suffered a major setback in Donald Trump's victory in November, they did not give up.
Whether it is through the Blue State Legislature, Legislative or Internationalism They continue to mislead their misleading of the energy sector in the United States.
But European Green advocates will soon find that they have met the game in Donald Trump and his energy team.
The highest image of German wind farm through YouTube screenshot
Read more in Daily Callers
