From Paris to the Permian, Trump resumed rational energy policies – Watt gets along with it?

Vijay Jayaraj

The dialogue around U.S. energy policy has long been brewed by partisan hatred, media sensationalism and international grandiose drugs. Left-wing media are now pushing President Trump’s position to attack rational itself. But the opposite is the fact.

What we witness is not denying science or retreating from reality. It's a bold and pragmatic recalibration – a vision derived from economics, a scientific clarity that refuses to let American industrial supremacy erode bureaucratic and globalist agendas.

Back to energy advantages

Energy costs ripples in every corner of the economy. When electricity prices soar or fuel scarce, manufacturers expand, and small businesses’ shutters and households are pinched. For decades, the United States has been an enviable position as an energy superpower due to fossil fuels and other natural resources, technological creativity and relatively free markets.

However, in recent years, this advantage has been jeopardized by climate regulations, green subsidies and international climate commitments that often prioritize political optics over actual results.

For example, taking the Paris Agreement as an example, Trump intends to withdraw for the second time after Beden withdraws his withdrawal during Trump’s first term. The agreement is called a scientific convention, but it is a political convention – full of vulnerabilities in China and India, the world's largest carbon dioxide transmitter, while placing the United States on a disproportionate cost. The United Nations, which oversees, has a long history of integrating science and ideology. Its climate summit is as important as progress, with strong airplanes representing representatives demanding their own sacrifices.

Biden's year features “green” technology (wind, solar, battery storage) plus the killing of oil and gas development. Organizations like the Department of Energy remit billions of dollars into doomed projects, repeating the Obama administration’s Solindra collapse on a massive scale. Meanwhile, the mechanism stepped on its feet on the terminals of the pipe and the liquefied liquid outlet.

Trump’s policy shift – emphasizing production of fossil fuels, simplifying licensing and retreating from a dogmatic green agenda – provides opportunities to pursue a working method. This is rationality disguised as scientific consensus and rejection of corruption and group thinking.

By releasing domestic oil and gas production in places like the Permian Basin, Alaska and offshore, Trump is betting on decades of oil deposits that could provide the country with decades of oil deposits, as well as gas reserves that could power the world. This is not a nostalgia of past times, but a recognition that fossil fuels are still the most reliable, scalable and cost-effective energy available today.

Left embraces pseudoscience

The left accuses Trump of ignoring the science of settlement. But what solved it? Of course, it is not a requirement to abandon verification technology in exchange for a so-called renewable style doomsday script that makes platform shoes look practical.

Over the years, climate debates have been related to data and more to dogma. Almost all future predictions of climate by the intergovernmental group on intergovernmental climate change are based on scientific inaccurate assumptions about climate sensitivity to greenhouse gases.

Even if the United Nations moderate emissions surfaced, global temperatures are expected to rise by only 2-3 degrees Celsius in 2100 – almost not the end of the world and likely to be a beneficial result.

Trump's guarantee of cutting the traditional Chinese tape festival is a wasteful war. He dares to bet that American industry is not stubborn and can provide cleaner and cheaper energy faster than any government task.

Until recently, fear, introspective and globalist cliches have determined energy policy, currently able to reflect reality and address economic demands of affordable power and strategic needs to stay ahead in a competitive and dangerous world.

The comment was originally Bizpac Review March 12, 2025.

Vijay Jayaraj is a Science and Research Assistant company₂ allianceArlington, Virginia. he He holds a Master of Environmental Science from the University of East Anglia and a Bachelor of Science in Energy Management from Robert Gordon University in the UK, and a Bachelor of Engineering from Anna University in India.

Related