Vijay Jayaraj
For many people around the world, the U.S. Federal Reserve's decision to withdraw from the Green Finance System (NGF) shows that central banks can refocus their main mandates: stabilizing economies, controlling inflation and promoting growth.
Developing countries that need financial support to develop fossil fuel projects to drive economic development hope to look forward to injecting the emptiness of the climate change agenda into a monetary policy reversal. This corruption in the financial system puts the “green” mandate of poverty in the third world to bear the “green” task of eliminating poverty and accompanying poverty.
Currently, NGFS membership includes central banks and financial institutions from 22 countries in Africa, 32 in the Asia-Pacific region, and 20 countries in the Americas, and may now be courageous to reassess and abandon them – regardless of their assigned priorities for climate initiatives.
Banks and asset managers often seek guidance from central banks on regulatory priorities. The Fed's departure may prompt others to reduce their useless climate commitments, ending unnecessary transfers of resources from direct socio-economic challenges.
Time when the global central banks begin to leave Egypt
For example, the Canadian federal government has implemented many climate policies, resulting in increased carbon taxes, more volatility in the energy sector, lower export revenues and an overall catastrophic economic situation. Aspiring to drive Canada towards a more climate-stupid man is Mark Carney, who was recently elected as Canadian Prime Minister by the ruling Liberal Party.
However, other Canadians have different ideas. “Major banks in North America are leaving Mark Carney's international net-zero banking program, but some Canadian banks remain members,” said Rebecca Schulz, Minister of Environment and Protection Areas of Alberta. “The rest of Canadian banks must abandon Carney's net-zero banking alliance and once again invest in safe, affordable, reliable Canadian energy.” ”
There is no time wasted in the global south
Even global entities that are financial bridges for development projects such as the World Bank, the African Development Bank and the Asian Development Bank are deeply rooted in climate politics, denying that billions of people have potential access to affordable fossil fuels.
NGFS membership comes with the expectation of passing expensive climate-related financial regulations. In the south of the globe, millions still do not have access to electricity or water, and these priorities are completely out of touch with reality.
More than 40% of the African population (600 million people) do not have access to electricity. This translates into 20% of families with shortages and 30% of children with acute malnutrition. Every day, one in 10,000 succumb to famine.
Nearly 4 million people around the world (about the population of Los Angeles) die prematurely each year due to a lack of clean cooking fuel like natural gas. If financial institutions remove cumbersome investments in fossil fuel production, they can save a lot.
Excessive inflation, monetary instability and unemployment are direct threats and require urgent attention in developing countries. Redirecting resources to these issues will compare obsession with wind turbines and solar panels to prevent fabricated climate crisis.
While the U.S. Federal Reserve – the largest funders of the United Nations and the World Bank are choosing to wake up the climate cabal, central banks in poorer countries also have no business involved in the waste of time and money of NGFS.
Developing countries must seize this opportunity to advocate for their financial autonomy. Central banks in poor countries should choose to prioritize the well-being of their populations and ensure that global financial governance reflects the economic realities of the need to end mandatory climate policies.
The comment was originally RealClearMarkets March 12, 2025.
Vijay Jayaraj is a Science and Research Assistant company2 allianceArlington, Virginia. he He holds a Master of Environmental Science from the University of East Anglia and a Bachelor of Science in Energy Management from Robert Gordon University in the UK, and a Bachelor of Engineering from Anna University in India.
Related
Discover more from Watt?
Subscribe to send the latest posts to your email.