According to the United Nations, “climate change is a global emergency that goes beyond national borders.” In the World Economic Forum, “urgent global action must be taken to reduce emissions and protect human health from the many negative negative effects of global climate change.” [emphasis, links added]
From every transnational institution in the world, we hear the same message. From the World Bank, “The world is fighting the perfect storm of climate, conflict, economic and natural crises.”
Starting from the World Health Organization, “between 2030 and 2050, climate change is expected to cause malnutrition, malaria, diarrhea and calories to cause approximately 250,000 deaths each year.”
A major issue with the consistency of this “emergency” is that, for at least half of those living in Western countries in 2025, the United Nations, WEF, WEF, WHO, and the World Bank are not credible.
Since the middle class is crushed, we don’t want to “do nothing”. We do not want the only way to rely on population replacement for national economic growth. With only the slightest arithmetic, we regard the declaration of the end of the world as lack of materiality.
For example, while 250,000 “annual additional deaths” are tragic, the estimated global total death toll is not 70 million per year.
These “extra deaths” account for 0.36% of the benchmark, accounting for only one-third of the three percent. There is even no rounding error.
Similarly, the NASA's alarmers predicted: “The Antarctic loses an average of ice (melt), ice mass (melt) each year, and Greenland loses about 270 billion tons per year, increasing sea level rise.”
Let's unpack some packages. A billion tons are gigatons, equivalent to one cubic kilometer. As a result, Antarctic loses 150 cubic kilometers of ice every year.
But Antarctic estimates that the total ice cube is 30 million cubic kilometers. This means that the Antarctic is losing Two percent of one-two thousand Its annual ice quality.
This is much lower than the accuracy of the measurement. This is an estimate that indicates meaningless conclusion.
One might wonder Greenland, with only 2.9 million cubic kilometers of ice, an estimated 2.7 million geytons of ice melting each year.
But this still produces less than One percent Each year, it is almost certainly lower than the ability to actually evaluate the total ice cube and the total loss of annual ice.
What about sea level rise? Again, the conclusions drawn by basic mathematics are incredible. The total surface area of the world's oceans is 361 million square kilometers.
If you spread the 420 Gitton group on that surface (the melting of Greenland and Antarctica together), your sea level rises no more than 1.2 mm each year. Again, it's so trivial that Below the threshold for our measurement capabilities.
These basic facts will turn anyone willing to do basic fact checks into cynical people. what is going on?
We have at least glimpsed the truth from the above quote from the World Bank, where they attribute human challenges to several reasons: “climate, conflict, economic and natural crises.”
The distinction they make is valuable. They list “natural crisis” and, at least explicitly, they don't even cite “climate”, which is due to certain man-generated trends that raise temperatures and increasingly extreme weather. They just say “climate”.
Even if catastrophic climate events have nothing to do with any so-called “climate crisis”, we still face “climate” challenges.
This brings us to a point: conflict and economic crises are a larger source of human suffering, the serious environmental challenges we face have nothing to do with climate change, and how we manage industries, wilderness and natural resources.
Even if catastrophic climate events have nothing to do with any so-called “climate crisis”, we still face “climate” challenges.
A perfect example of how the climate “crisis” narrative was misapplied when in fact, climate-related catastrophes occurred in the catastrophic floods that destroyed Pakistan in 2022.
Despite the apocalyptic spin of PBS (etc.), these floods are not unusual due to “climate change.”
They are an unusual disaster because in just 60 years, the country's population has grown from 45 million to 240 million.
They have guided the rivers to build dense new settlements to once floodplain and other marginal lands, and they stripped their own forests, which allowed the forest to absorb the ability to absorb runoff and had paved thousands of square miles to create impermeable surfaces that are impermeable to permeability.
What is called “science” today is usually just a left-wing advocacy.
This is the reason @scrowder Be able to hold a “science” conference in a scam.
He dressed like a woman, gave a speech, and received good reviews.
See what went wrong with you: pic.twitter.com/ohdmk0i3oz
-John Stossel (@johnstossel) October 17, 2024
Of course, a big storm made a mess. The weather has not changed. The country has changed.
Disaster stories are repeated everywhere. Contrary to the narrative, the main reason is not “climate change.”
A bigger tsunami? Perhaps it was because the coastal aquifers were overdrawn, causing land to settle, or because the formerly uninhabited tidlands were settled because the population made up less than two generations, while coastal mangroves were destroyed, which had once relieved the waves.
What about deforestation? Perhaps because these countries have been deprived of the ability to develop gas and hydropower, they have deprived the forests of cooking food.
In some cases, they are burning their own forests to make room for biofuel plantations to show irony and corruption.
In California, our country’s epicenter fear of the climate crisis and subsequent business opportunism, the emphasis on crisis rather than resilience leads to ridiculous policies.
Instead of bringing the wood industry back to the thin forests of the wood industry, the governor has authorized the exclusive sales of electric vehicles by 2035.
California has 75% of its oil imports adequate crude reserves, rather than being filled with diamonds in California, and its economy still relies on oil to get half of the energy the state consumes.
Globally, these mistakes breed.
Biofuel plantations consume half a million square miles to replace two percent of transport fuel.
Frantic scrambles across continents to increase the order of magnitude of mining to meet the raw material needs of producing batteries, wind turbines and solar panels.
Denied funds for natural gas development in Africa, condemning the ongoing energy poverty of one billion people.
The climate crisis narrative hides simple truths. We need to rebuild infrastructure for climate resilience, because most of it has lasted more than a century, and is simultaneously twice the population of the United States.
Floods and hurricanes can cause greater damage because there are more people, and more of them always Hit by floods and hurricanes.
Reading break in Arizona Sun Age
