British temperature “record” from the airport runway to the long-term archive – Where is Watt?

Daily Skeptics

How we laughed when the Metropolitan Office announced a UK temperature record of 40.3°C at 3.12 pm on July 19, 2022, midway through the Raf Coningsby runway, when it subsequently transferred three typhoon jets. When the 60-second “record” briefly rose to 0.6°C, Mirth was unrestricted and the Metropolitan Office declared a “mile mark in British climate history”. It now seems that another busy RAF station in Lincolnshire is in the process of a “joke” record business. It seems that on the same day at 40.3°C, RAF Waddington also announced record-breaking heights and has been fed into archives run by the Center for Environmental Data Analysis (CEDA). Although the Metropolitan Office itself will be called the Wadington Reading “suspect” due to the use of herbicides. It was unclear at the time that this should remove the temperature recorded at four feet above the ground, and the excuse was a little touching about it.

Whether it is Weed Magazine, Wadington's 40.3°C recordings are all in the METAS MIDAS OPEN dataset. It is said to be one of the most popular data sets of CEDA, which contains historical meteorological observations from the present to the 18th century. There is no doubt that they will be popular with future scientists who will be able to point out two records of 40.3°C, happy to ignore any airport thermal corruption, or even more severe warmth, which seems to stem from the application of Paraquat.

Again, shouted to Ray Sanders, the super-unified citizen, who was conducting a forensic review (exist and non-existent) of the Met Office’s UK temperature station and checked the operation’s published readings and data. He recently asked about archived Waddington recordings and was told that the data points were suspicious because of herbicide treatments. He noted that the Metropolitan Office was obviously a puzzle because it claimed that reading was suspicious, but the numbers passed to the archive could only come from it. Sanders believes any questions about Coningsby can be manually waved with “peer-reviewed science” data, proving that the high temperature is also “recorded elsewhere.”

The Metropolitan Office clearly owes the public and scientific community a complete explanation. Regular numbers can make mistakes, “But how likely is it to be the highest allegedly in the UK?” asked Sanders.

As a regular reader will remember, Ray Sanders recently discovered that the Metropolitan Office has been inventing the temperature averages of 103 non-existent locations. The Metropolitan Office even provides coordinates, elevations and purposes of fictional locations. Follow great interest on social media and repost frequently Daily suspicion The Metropolitan Office ruled its database as a “specific location” and deleted the site coordinates. The subsequent “fact check” Scientific feedback The Metropolitan Office seems to have written this to a large extent, claiming that the average data for some radio stations is not “fabricated” but is estimated using “related related sites”. It is said that this is a scientific method published in peer-reviewed literature. then, Daily suspicion Emphasizes the Cawood case in western Yorkshire, a primitive 1-level website with no unnatural thermal corruption and a great reading record dating back to 1959. The Cawood was inserted into the “position-specific” database of the Metropolitan Office renamed, without a record of 30 years of temperature. Instead, there are four other estimated sites that no longer exist, one fifth of them 27 miles away, higher in height.

Sanders now proposes worse examples of these fictional readings. Just when you think things won't get worse, he investigates Norwich's location. It is an area closely related to the work of the Metropolitan Office, its connections to the University of East Anglia and past television recordings from the local weather centre. Norwich has had many temperature records since 1873, but no temperature records are provided under “position specific” Norwich. Instead, despite nearby open locations, long-term average temperatures from the five closed enclosed stations invented data. Sanders is not inclined to charity, noting: “The fact is simple, the vast majority of people in the metropolitan office’s climate average data are secretly covered up by a system accepted by an anonymous peer reviewer rally, operating a closed data, a secret that is a very protected secret.”

Temperature measurements play a crucial role in promoting politicization of net-zero fantasies, so it is no accident that green activists in state-run weather operations such as the Metropolitan Office have already provided weapons to data. However, collection systems have never been designed to provide up to one hundred differentiation accuracy. Almost the entire MET office temperature network is blasted by non-natural heat, and rough estimates of the data are widespread throughout the system. Under the World Meteorological Organization classification system, almost 80% of MET office sites are in 4 and 5 of garbage levels, at 2°C and 5°C respectively.

The intergovernmental panel on climate change claims that humanity has caused the greatest warming in the past 100 years, but UN agencies don’t know that and are in fact unproveable. All of this artificial fear that leads to mass scientific ignorance and psychosis is the product of computer models that attempt to measure chaos and nonlinear atmospheres. Many important effects on weather and long-term climates such as water vapor and clouds are little known. It is impossible to measure the contribution of greenhouse gases (such as carbon dioxide) to any current warming (or cooling), and estimates of the estimated atmosphere volume are almost unchanged to 10°C and above in a “saturated” environment. The temperature records from national and frequently adjusted global datasets are unreliable and have little effect on merely improving speculative predictions. In the world of climate computer modeling, small changes to data can lead to a large number of changes in predictions.

But in the world of “settling” climate science, it is probably the most corrupt branch of science in the world – it is rubbish, the gospel.

Chris Morrison is Daily suspicionenvironment editing.

Related