
Upon the law
As “climate change” is removed from the national threat assessment, Bloomberg’s opinion article provides a great list of all the winning teams Trump has had in the past 52 days.
Posted by Leslie Eastman
The move to familiarize anyone with real climate science [thrilled? sic]climate change has been excluded from the annual assessment of the U.S. intelligence community’s threat to the country.
This is the first time in more than a decade.
Maine's independent Senator Angus King National Intelligence Director Tulsi Gabbard has been re-tuning security priorities in the ears of the U.S. Senate, the prevalence and arrogance of pseudo-false newbies in New England.
In addition, we have mentioned that global climate change is a major national security threat to global climate change. Is something happening? Is global climate change solved? Why not in this report, who decides that no report should be in the report, should not be in the report? ”
Gabbard's response was a blow, suggesting that her agency had other more pressing priorities.
National Intelligence Director Tulsi Gabbard told members of the Senate Intelligence Committee on Tuesday that to make the intelligence community understand their “given” environment, the report “attention is very much on our most important threat to the United States and our national security.”
“The annual threat assessment I focus on and [intelligence community] She explained that focusing this threat assessment is on the most extreme and direct threats to our national security.
Gabbard said she did not remember directing the intelligence community to avoid mentioning climate change in the 31-page report.
Gabbard expressed appropriate national security priorities, which did not include some additional elements of lifelong natural gas. The Earth's climate is in a constant state of change, and I'll also notice that when you consider the planetary history of the past 485 million years, we are at a low temperature.
So I'm more concerned about terrorists, cyber threats, unrestricted illegal immigration and China's military capabilities than about the potential degree of changes in global temperature measurements, which is essentially meaningless.
It turns out that the only danger of melting in the current environment is the left. Perhaps the most compelling historic reaction came through the Bloomberg public opinion work, which sums up 52 glorious days of President Donald Trump’s orders to redirect the country’s resources, money and energy.
From the Environmental Protection Agency to the Department of Defense, every agency with any connection to climate involves any connection to climate (basically all). International cooperation such as NASA scientists, UN diplomats have been banned, and Trump-appointed people are interfering in state and local efforts to manage their environment.
Elon Musk staff intend to demolish the government’s agency, which freezes research and funding and has important expertise on the street.
Trump claims his climate demolition will benefit the country. He and his cigarette holder believe that ignoring the climate will reduce consumers’ energy costs, help the economy and ensure the “energy advantage” in the United States.
The author condemns the effort as a great work for several days of demolition. My reply:

Indeed, 2025 is a “happy” election.

Hot Air's Beege Welborne has a good assessment of Trump's 52-day policy success, as carefully mapped out the way the authors (Mark Gongloff and Elaine) intend to achieve.
They literally created a chart that tells you what the Trump administration’s numbers are, what he did, what he took away, and what days it affected and multiple days.
Here are the lines:
16 NOAA The nominee leading the agency is Trump's “Sharpiegate” promoter disaster 17 state Rejected $4 billion commitment to the United Nations Green Climate Fund International cooperation 52 days.
Over the past few years, I've written a lot about the climate industry being ripped through taxes, which is just rushing to catch up for the rest of Trump's arrival.
These hardcore advocates melted in just two months of this administration, both telling Trump's efforts and how far the decay is progressing.
I must admit, I was shocked that a lot has been done in 52 days. I can't wait to see where we are at 100!
Related
Discover more from Watt?
Subscribe to send the latest posts to your email.