The writer has not claimed no privileged information and is very optimistic, Jared Isaacman leads NASA by coming Trump [pictured above]will terminate funding from NASA's Goddard Space Research Institute (GISS) and jointly terminate funding with the redirection of the space program and the promotion of energy priorities. [emphasis, links added]
The Wall Street Journal is said to be clearer in the internal pictures. The critical path to the transition of the ambitious human Mars plan will redirect important funds from easily consumed climate research and related green energy agendas.
According to the Wall Street Journal, President Trump announced the appointment shortly after Musk had approached Isaacman, who had flew to Orbit with SpaceX and invested in the company, asking if he would do the job.
These three, Trump, Musk and Isaacman, all have independent and wealthy billionaire backgrounds and rare distant social goals.
In his Congressional inaugural speech, Trump said he would initiate Americans to “plant stars and stripes on Mars and Earth.”
“We will be able to bring astronauts to Mars and ultimately build a self-sustaining civilization on Mars. This is the company's long-term goal: to make life traversals more.”
Isaacman, the founder of Shift4, a payment processing company, partially funded SpaceX's “Polaris Dawn” lower track mission and flew to the 2021 Wall Street Journal in a crew, “You have to pass through the comfort of ours.”
“I can say with confidence that the second space age has just begun,” he said after Trump announced his nomination to lead NASA in the position of X.
Dialing back to NASA GISS, It’s hard to imagine any of these three dedicated space exploration operations looking to continue shifting the agency’s annual $25 billion budget to support ugly posters children’s climate shocks for the reform of waste spending.
Some will remember that Nassa Giss is a small climate modeling store located in a Manhattan office building that was originally used to give unnecessary credibility, providing credibility from the outset for the human-caused global warming crisis.
Former GISS director James Hansen first attracted global attention in 1988 before his star witness testimony.
This observation is consistent with concerns about a particularly warm summer in some parts of the United States that year.
Over time, Hanson's statement became increasingly dramatic.
In a speech to the American Geophysical Union on December 6, 2005, he said that the Earth's climate has reached a turning point, which will lead to the loss of Arctic ice as we know it, which has risen as much as 80 feet in this century, thus flooding the coastal areas.
He warned that this can only be stopped if greenhouse gas emissions are reduced in the next 25 years.
Hanson was subsequently arrested three times during climate protests while holding a NASA position, but he was never fired.
In 2011, seven Apollo astronauts, as well as two former NASA Johnson Space Center directors and several former senior management technicians, went to NASA administrator Charles Bolden, Jr. A formal complaint was filed on the frustrating and embarrassing state of the agency’s climate science program.
An April 10 letter cautioned the agency to play a role in highly defining certainty of artificial carbon dioxide as the main cause of climate change while ignoring the basic empirical evidence that challenges the theory.
The organization also accused NASA of general, especially GISS Unable to objectively evaluate all available scientific data on climate change yes Relying too heavily on complex climate models, these climate models are not scientifically sufficient for climate prediction.
It specifically asked the GISS, led by Hansen, to “avoid the inclusion of unconfirmed speech on public distributions and websites.”
As Gavin Schmidt, who succeeded Hansen as GISS director, told the prestigious Journal Science in 2021: “In the past year or so, we have not been able to avoid such admissions” because these models cannot be regarded as policy tools because, because, because, “Even in the near future, you end up with numbers that are incredible and wrong.”
So, you have.
If GISS frankly admits that it is impossible to believe in predicting the future of climate, then there is any possible basis for believing that humans can change any outcome by converting from fossil energy into windmills and electric vehicles. Why does NASA allow such irrelevant non-predictive impact on future Mars expeditions?
Is it time to make the once-decoration and inspirational space program awesome again?
Read more on Newsmax
