After abandoning objective reports, mainstream media rejected a neutral stance on climate change, turning a complex scientific debate into a holistic narrative of the imminent disaster. [emphasis, links added]
Far from impartial arbitrators, media media are enthusiastic propagandists who recycle the apocalyptic predictions that never come true, ignoring a large amount of scientific research, challenging the narrative of catastrophic warming.
This is not journalism; it is activism disguised as truth. result? A global population is misled, policy makers are influenced by novels, and developing countries are bound by energy policies, prioritizing the “green” ideology over the well-being of humanity.
Lies, more lies and panic
Almost every major publisher and broadcaster comes from Atlantic and Los Angeles Times arrive guardian and BBC – Prognosis of climate apocalypse regularly.
These media operate from the “post-truth” script: amplify the most extreme predictions, discard them when rejected, and report the next terrible story.
1971 Washington Post It is said that fossil fuel emissions will introduce the Ice Age. Yes, you read it correctly: Ice Age!
In 2006, Guardian announces The CBS reports that the future will be snow-free areas in parts of the UK in 2009, with Arctic ice disappearing soon in the summer.
Question: All those crazy, fearful prophecies didn't pass.
The “global cooling” panic in the 1970s, the hurricane craze in the 2000s and the “ocean acidification” panic in the 2010s, and the respiratory dyspnea was quietly abandoned. The goal is not accuracy; it is persistent fear.
The media elevates non-experts to prophetic status while watching strict scientific discourse. If Al Gore was the prophet of climate doom, Greta Thunberg became his patron saint.
Thunberg, a teenager without a scientific certificate, quickly escalated to global fame through cynical reporting and cynical exploitation of children.
Her 2019 “How dare you?” speech is a master class in emotional rhetoric, called by Clarion, a betrayal generation.
In society, media shockism breeds despair and division. Young people bombarded by images of dying planets, reporting an increase in levels of “climate anxiety”, a phenomenon recorded in 2021 The Lancet study.
Meanwhile, the insult of skeptics stifles the debate and creates an echo chamber where only one point of view can be tolerated. This is not a sign of free media, but a sign of a propaganda machine.
Call for authority in the global south
Perhaps the most tragic consequences of such media malfeasance unfold in developing countries.
News organizations in Asia, Africa and Latin America often copy alert content from Western media without independent verification.
Due to limited local expertise or balanced research, news media in these regions fallacies calling on authorities to accept the BBC or guardian It is based on impeccable science.
This creates a feedback loop that assumes that Western media reflects scientific consensus that falsehood can be sustained.
The result is a dangerous distortion of priorities. Countries that struggle with poverty, unemployment and energy insecurity are under pressure to adopt economically devastating policies based on fallacies of climate fear.
It has led to a policy pattern in which developing countries adopt expensive, ineffective and totally useless energy and environmental policies, but at the expense of economic progress.
A sacred pulpit in an open space
Our planet is green More than ever Break the recordhumans are blunt Natural disasters are impacted by innovation.
But the media refuses to report any optimism that doesn't prove a trillion-dollar “green” fool.
The Climate Industrial Complex is a longing scholar, rent-seeking company and activist – a cabal of journalists – that transforms the newsroom into a comic book comic book pulpit.
Top photo of Javier Miranda
Reading break in the American Thinker
