Ed Miliband is obsessed with. The energy minister was stolen by the same manic arrogance, Messianism that stopped traffic, which wasted police time and ruined people's days as the loone green group extinction of rebellion and stop oil. [emphasis, links added]
Like so much ecology-Western people, people, in fact those who work are feed, consumeable, swept away, because the dystopian vision of Britain (a decarbonized grid five years from now) is forced to reject us.
In the election of Labour, Miliband promised to “move quickly and build things” a £40 billion investment a year. By “building things,” does Miliband actually mean to destroy things?
Some believe that the plan to stop the North Sea oil and gas drilling permits is the main impact of our heavy reliance on natural gas in enemy countries, and it is estimated that more than 100,000 UK jobs will be lost.
It is no surprise that Miliband has become an increasingly responsible responsibilities of the workforce. According to the government's own national energy system operator, his plan will be filled with negligence, eyes and shocking noise and other nuisance processes in a short time, across the country – according to the government's own national energy system operator, it is “a limit to feasible delivery.” Embarrassing.
It also won't work, not only because it's not “viable deliverable” but because it's still UK and we can't be completely affected by the action of the Eco Hall.
I don't like reform, but I'm really satisfied with Vice Chairman and Lincolnshire Councilman Richard Tice's warnings about renewable energy plans in their area:
“We will attack, we will hinder, we will delay, we will hinder, we will put all the obstacles into practice in your way. This will make you pay a fortune and you will not win.
Critics’ views on how this perspective translates into the hope of losing the thousands of jobs created by the industry in net zero infrastructure. But it's a bit like pointing out the cost of a fire extinguisher trying to stop Rome from burning. …
But the current proposal is both meaningless and dangerous. Even if we now have the fewest industries in the UK and are a rapidly declining agricultural sector, it hardly becomes or undermines this issue.
America, India, Africa, the Arab world… These people may make a difference, but they don't particularly want to do so. In some cases, this is the opposite.
At the same time, since Miliband's desire is widely regarded as an extremely dangerous and huge national security risk, the full tilt is zero.
Close our gas pipeline means dependence on Russia and others, and vulnerable, we still import some natural gas from it, and Qatar, not exactly liberal democracy, is also a major exporter of natural gas.
Meanwhile, China is 80% of the world's solar panels, and you can't remake an energy net in the image of Miliband's dream without monopolizing your ears on green energy.
While Labor is busy getting comfortable with China, perhaps it should be more of a consideration for the “communication devices” found in solar cells and converters made in China, and then connect the panels to the grid.
The device is able to bypass firewalls and has catastrophic national security consequences.
“We know that China believes it is valuable to put at least some of the elements of our core infrastructure at the risk of damage or damage,” said Mike Rogers, a former director of the NSA. It is a terrible threat.
However, Miliband and his companion Zero Evangelion missionary are choosing this future for Britain, rather than when we want, we can all cook the kettle without worrying about overweight grids and retaining a certain level of sovereignty, which will be very convenient when the next world war is really in trouble.
Miliband's vision is unimaginable for us modern people who are accustomed to life in the first world.
Due to the unexpected surge, we seem to be beginning to adapt to the massive disruption that has put Spain and Portugal in a stagnation. In this case, foul competition from foreign power is not excluded.
Top image of Ed Miliband singing at the wind farm. GBNews/YouTube Screenshots
Read the full post in the Telegraph
