Net Zero Spikes: Five Reasons for Net Zero Net Zero Will Break Out UK The Global Warming Policy Foundation (GWPF) released today. It describes how the UK's net zero target lockdown is locked at higher energy prices and forces ministers to limit public choices. [emphasis, links added]
In this abominable new analysis, GWPF policy chief Harry Wilkinson outlines how it can be rooted in the Climate Change Act, raising energy prices, undermining industrial competitiveness and depriving energy sovereignty Britain of its net zero policy.
“With admirable justice, Wilkinson explains the devastating cost of the net cost.” Steve Baker, The chief provocative officer who provokes people.
“Every politician and journalist should read this article to be ahead of the scandal, which is our energy policy. It is an important contribution to save our civilization from the consequences of unbearable, intermittent energy.”
Lord Frost The report calls it a “debate of long-term corrections of orthodox and wishful thinking,” the report notes that it “simplely reveals the fundamental flaws of net zero”, especially “if we are to avoid disasters, the restrictive and authoritarian nature of the Climate Change Act must be abolished.”
Councillor Graham Stringer “There is evidence that net zero is destroying work and hurting the economy,” said the company. An initial well-intentioned initiative has become a monster of an out-of-control Frankenstein This article is exposed. We cannot continue to carry out self-harm, disastrous policies. ”
Director GWPF, Lord McKinley, Describe zero net as “a perfect description of the tattooed image” and adds: “Businesses and their workers cannot be decarbonized quickly and will just be thrown on the scrap pile; this is a process that has begun. I hope this report will help uncover some of the misleading thinking that has put us in this dangerous situation.”
exist Net Zero Tight JacketWilkinson put forward five key arguments:
1. The cost of renewable energy is underestimated. The published official analysis has not fully taken into account variable weather patterns, which means years of wind and drought can occur. This means that the amount of power generation and storage required for 2050 has not been correctly calculated.
2. Electricity prices may rise furtherthe renewable industry appears to be betting on the results and is “built in” by increasing renewable energy subsidies and growing grid efficiency.
3. Mandatory policy plunges Britain into tattoos It can only make the public poorer. Forced use of electric vehicles, heat pumps and overly stringent environmental standards can reduce consumer choices and make the public worse. The Climate Change Act connects all future governments to these strict requirements.
4. We will miss using the energy under our feet. Our pursuit of net zero opportunities The opportunities we miss need to be recognized. Failure to extract our massive fossil fuel reserves means a large amount of potential tax revenues that are not harvested, and many people miss out on high-skilled and highly paid jobs. Importing natural gas and oil means tax revenue, work and investment abroad.
5. The benefits do not accumulate. The government uses flawed “carbon values” to claim the enormous benefits of its climate policies. However, these are highly competitive and do not represent the real benefit of the British public in lower emissions.
In his own words, Harry Wilkinson warned: “The public misleads on the cost and consequences of net zero. This report articulates the reality: a deep dictatorial agenda that increases the cost of living for everyone.”
The full report can be read here: Net Zero Spikes (PDF).
