New Heartland Institute paper breaks down how carbon capture and storage plans threaten property rights — is Watt surprised?

From the Heartland Institute.

Dr. H. Sterling Burnett

Capturing and storing carbon dioxide is also a huge waste of resources and can cause other harms

ARLINGTON HEIGHTS, Ill. (January 22, 2025) — Carbon capture and storage (CCS) programs have become an increasingly popular method through which climate activists pursue “net-zero” global carbon dioxide (CO₂)emission. A new paper from the Heartland Institute urges policymakers to resist CCS projects, which often require the use of eminent domain to seize private property from landowners.

The title of this paper is Carbon capture and property rights: There is no reason to use carbon capture and storage projects to abolish property rightsfirst briefly introduces the series of events and the overall agenda that triggered CCS, and explains the CCS process. It then covers the significant public health and environmental issues that may directly result from CCS projects, as well as the large-scale public-private partnerships and financing mechanisms that incentivize the spread of CCS.

The paper concludes by clarifying how CCS indeed poses an imminent threat to Americans' fundamental private property rights and providing concrete recommendations for state and federal policymakers to protect these rights and resist the green agenda.

Authors Jack McPherrin, Dr. H. Sterling Burnett, and Daylea DuVall Camp make some recommendations including that state policymakers eliminate or mitigate CCS companies' ability to use eminent domain through the designation of common carriers, and that federal policymakers discontinue the use of eminent domain. . Regulation of CO₂ Considered a hazardous pollutant and cut off funding for CCS projects.

Read more here.

The following statements from climate and energy experts at the Heartland Institute may be used for attribution.

“Efforts to introduce carbon capture and storage (CCS) measures in the energy sector are a waste of government support. CCS is scientifically unjustified because we are not facing a climate crisis and are not causing economic damage due to rising energy costs. . And, of all the scams, CCS results in forced sales of people's properties. No one should be forced to allow a CCS pipeline to be built on their land because it serves no public purpose; rather, it is just for political purposes. Politicians and public utility commissions should take action to clearly prevent CCS companies from using eminent domain to violate people's constitutionally guaranteed property rights.

Dr. H. Sterling Burnett

Director, Arthur B. Robinson Center for Climate and Environmental Policy
heartland institute

Relevant