A recent article Washington Post It caught my attention. It outlines the staggering losses of over 3 million birds among breeding adults over the past half century (water birds are an exception due to wetland protection). [emphasis, links added]
This article continues to discuss possible reasons. Not surprisingly, habitat is lost in it. Then, of course, the leading common suspects were rounded up. That's climate change.
this Postal – yes Postal – Solar energy and wind farms are not the main culprit. That is the third track of the green industrial complex. Postal, The New York Timesand NPR dares not to touch it for fear of offending their elite base of progress; or sacrifice birds and butterflies on the altar of climate change?
I'm not a birdwatcher, but I keep feeders and a few milkweed and wildflower gardens in the yard to attract other pollinators. I recognize the value of their contribution and have been interested in the decline of birds and butterfly species.
To my surprise, these rapid decline trends coincide with the gradual rise in wind and solar farms that began with the Carter administration four and a half years ago.
The deaths of many birds nationwide are directly attributed to wind farms. However, we have little influence on them in mainstream media. I suspect the fanatical impact of the green industrial academic complex has a lot to do with it.
In the upstate New York where I live, many residents complained distressed about the land lost by wind and solar farms. They are usually written off by democratic governments, which tells them that it is for their kindness and the interests of the planet.
Unlike previous military industrial complexes, which were driven by the real demand for military competition with the Soviet Union, the green industrial academic complex was driven by absurd and exaggerated threats.
Rarely go to one day Washington Post NPR or CNN will not blame climate change for something. There is even a group of lazy people claiming that earthquakes increase and volcanic activity is related to climate change.
The biggest lie about climate change has become a traditional concept in most of the population
The philosophy here is based on Joseph Goebbels' theory of “Big Lies”. If lies are repeated frequently, then they become facts.
Today, the biggest lies about climate change have become a traditional concept in most of the population.
Fortunately, however, if the last election was any sign, most Americans were not drunk yet.
Climate change cults have many aids, some of whom are sincere believers. But too many left-wing fanatics want to completely eliminate carbon-based power, regardless of the economic impact.
There are also academic scammers who produce suspicious research and transformations of computer models. Worse, scam artists are sucking billions of dollars in attraction from government nipples.
If green energy is forced to survive on market demand rather than government funds, it could collapse in five years
So far, the Trump administration has done a great job trying to kill this parasitic vampire and I hope to work hard to succeed. But, like Count Dracula, if the stake is not driven forever in the end, then the next time the Democrats take control of Congress, it will rise from the dead.
Like most Zany progress programs, climate change cults have enormous potential to have unintended consequences and established goals to eliminate carbon-based power sources.
I just hope we don't destroy the environment to preserve it.
Read more in AM audience
